| Author |
Message |
| theOmnipotentOne |
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:29 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 44
Location:
|
Well, I guess I’m not really directing those remarks at you.
But there are a plenty of people/conspiracy theorists that just make crap up. |
~n00blit eater
Minnesota Twins > BoSox, Yankees, Dodgers, AND Mets... COMBINED. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| bobtheorc |
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:31 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 1218
Location: Wow, its hot in Iowa
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| inresponse |
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:08 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 162
Location:
|
how could that be an inside job? what would possibly make it easier, what is considered the inside, and I doubt you actually heard that because it is so far past the realm of ridiculousness. unless you mean the bush administration was behind it. then I migth agree just because I dislike his administration strongly.
I was actually at the wtc yesterday, and it is quite a sight. if you travel down wall street now, there are guards with semi automatic weapons and police cars lining the streets. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| physcosick |
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 4:12 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 229
Location:
|
inresponse wrote: I was actually at the wtc yesterday, and it is quite a sight. You mean the sight previously know as the WTC
 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| inresponse |
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:55 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 162
Location:
|
| no, then I would have used the word "site" and been grammatically correct. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| physcosick |
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:47 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 229
Location:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| inresponse |
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:31 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 162
Location:
|
| it doesn’t work either way. You can’t have a "sight" previously known as 9/11. that doesn’t make any sense. a site is a location, however, and the site that I saw was ground zero. and it was quite a sight. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| physcosick |
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:53 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 229
Location:
|
| The sight as in the sight you saw. You said that the WTC was a sight. Therefore I move it around and it does make sense if your not a complete loser. It’s a joke, laugh and stop acting like your good at english. I speak english good but you don’t see me running around being a... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| inresponse |
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:57 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 162
Location:
|
| there is no way you wrote that as a joke. and obv it’s I speak english well, but you were probably just joking about that too. |
| Last edited by inresponse on Sat Sep 09, 2006 7:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
| physcosick |
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 7:00 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 229
Location:
|
| I did write it as a joke... there was no other way to interpret that other than my sick humor. The speak well/good was a refrence i figured you’d appreciate... but I guess it’s above you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|