ok on the subject of carbon dating, did you know that they found a bone or something,1 around 100-200 years old. Carbon dating says the bone was 14,000,000 years old. just a bit inacurate!

It takes more than a a few thousand years for fossil fuels to form, even from dead things.

Evolution is a theory, correct, but still, explain fossil fuels!! Also, my World Hist teacher had something interesting to say...

I’m not sure what you mean about the electrical core... why would that mean the earth is 10,000 yrs of less? Makes 0 sense.

One more thing. So you’re saying the dinosaurs were killed in the flood? Why didn’t the dinosaurs kill the people before the flood?

The earth has a magnetic field generated from the core. But since there is no gigantic piece of magnetic solid metal in the core they assume that the magnet is an electro-magnet. Thus there is Electricity in the earths core.
if you can follow that I will explain why if the theory is correct the earth is les then 10,00- years old.

Stars: due to the speed of light, if the universe was created less then 10000 years ago like he suggests/believes, it would be impossible for us to see as many stars in the sky as we do. Why? the stars could be closer than what they appear, and let us just go on the idea that God did put them there (which i agree with). He could have made the light shine faster at the beginning of time, and slowed it down.

Carbon dating: just because there have been a couple cases of miscalculations, doesn’t dismiss it’s validity. Look at lie detector tests, they don’t read everyone correctly. DNA tests, they have a 99% accuracy rate. Repeat that enough times and your bound to find a mistake. Carbon dating has been used a lot to determine dates. What you have to do is look at the big picture and find a trend. So if there are 5000 bones that have been dated somewhat accurately ranging from 100,000-1 million years ago (example... dont take numbers seriously), but there are 5 that are obviously incorrect doesn’t mean anything. It’s one of two things: statistics or some kind of inner problem. Perhaps something in the carbon dating procedure messed up or maybe there was something that caused the process to mess up within the object. If it’s statistics, then if you repeat the process enough times there will have to be some margin of error. And in any bell curve, there is always the chance of outliners.

I am saying that carbon dating is not just a bit off, but rather alot off. most of the scientist that run carbon dating (if i am correct) are athiest. (kind of biast if you ask me) Carbon dating is just like radio dating. it uses numbers plugged into the computor to estimate not give solid fact date.

Fossils: It has been discussed. If there was a God I doubt he’d plant fossils in the ground just to confuse us. The time frame just doesn’t add up.

God didn’t confuse us, man confused man. he took radia / carbon dating, and tried to match things up. after the fall, fossils started appearing, then the flood happened. the water residue and blasts of water, could have aged the look of bones considerably. (if that is what happened. we don’t know)

Geographical phenomena: Basically, I could write a book on this. But that would require alot of research. You just have to look at platetectonics, formations of mountians, developing river systems, evidence within land surface indicating previous floods/volcanoes/etc that can be dated, pockets of air in blocks of ice in th ice caps, etc, etc.

Look at the flood. it destroyed and changed many land formations. changed plates in the earth, changed the looks of mountains...the list goes on.

Math: It’s all about statistics really. If you think about it, if the big bang really happened, the chance that it would occur, form earth, and have it placed specifically at the location between the moon and the sun, and create an orbit, and be able to create life which evolves, etc the chance of that is lets assume 0.000000000000000000000000000000013%. Now it is stated that space is infinite. So if you repeat that precentage over and over again an infinite ammount of times, it is bound to happen multiple times (infinite, actually). So right there, I just proved the strong possibilty of life on other planets......

It has been proven life cannot come about by and explosion. it is more possible for a tornado to go through a junkyard and a city like San diago. than have an explosion make something so intricate as life. (i have shot fire crackers, they don’t make life!) to have planet with the correct atmosphere, correct heat, correct rotation, correct gravity... is impossible.

GOOD DAY

I hope you aren’t bad mouthing Bush! He is the leader of the U.S. a hard responsibility. God tells us to pray for our leaders, so that is what he needs more than critisism.

I have never seen conclusive evidence of this thing u refer to as the flood. The only thing any where near it is an ice age that occured in North America when the ice caps melted and created many great lakes and rivers, etc.