LotR TCG Wiki
→ Card Sets: All 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
→ Forums: TLHH CC PC

Author Topic: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing  (Read 331 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


May 26, 2010, 04:35:04 am
Reply #1

ket_the_jet

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 2062
  • He/Him/His
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2010, 04:35:04 am »
I think you need more skirmish pumps for your [Dunland] minions. You have to win that first skirmish to get more out there, and if they don't win that skirmish then you have a clogged hand and no minions.
-wtk

May 26, 2010, 05:54:40 am
Reply #2

MuadDib85

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 940
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2010, 05:54:40 am »
You'd be suprised, the weakest guy has strength ten. They do actually win quite often, not only win but overwhelm people. Two sites let you grab Rabble Rouser along the way, otherwise I'd probably have an extra copy of him. War Cry of Dunland can be a really nice suprise if multiple copies can be played at the same time, that's why I like four of it. Along with Iron Axe and War Club they get pretty huge sometimes.

May 26, 2010, 06:07:21 am
Reply #3

chompers

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 561
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2010, 06:07:21 am »
If Hillman Mob wins and you play another minion that is fierce ...

what happens ... does the fierce minion you play only get one attack?

May 26, 2010, 06:11:29 am
Reply #4

MuadDib85

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 940
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2010, 06:11:29 am »
Yes. It doesn't matter if the minion played from hand is fierce already or not, it will only fight once.

The Witch-King's Beast, Fell Creature would be one of the only cards I can think of that would let a minion fight three times.

November 29, 2010, 06:28:39 pm
Reply #5

Haszor

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Villager
  • Posts: 287
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2010, 06:28:39 pm »
Your site seven is a shadow site while all others are Towers.  I'm pretty sure that's against the rules but other than that quite good looking.

November 29, 2010, 06:47:48 pm
Reply #6

MuadDib85

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 940
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2010, 06:47:48 pm »
:roll:

November 29, 2010, 08:02:55 pm
Reply #7

ket_the_jet

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 2062
  • He/Him/His
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2010, 08:02:55 pm »
He did specify 4U355. He just didn't put Cavern Entrance*.
-wtk

November 30, 2010, 12:04:50 am
Reply #8

TheJord

  • League Director
  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2294
  • High King of Rules
    • GamesCobra
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2010, 12:04:50 am »
This is an old topic, and the 2nd time you have made this mistake Haszor. Please read everything a bit more carefully.

Welcome to the boards
"The rule of Gondor is mine!"

November 30, 2010, 03:23:06 am
Reply #9

ket_the_jet

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 2062
  • He/Him/His
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2010, 03:23:06 am »
This is an old topic, and the 2nd time you have made this mistake Haszor.

To clarify theJord's point, it is not a "mistake" to revive old topics, but that is usually reserved to making original or good points about deck composition, or for the author to report on any changes made to the deck. Especially since most people do not use the asterisks when posting a deck--really, who wants to see the Ruling Ring**** in a FotR deck?--you should assume the appropriate card for that block. MuadDib has always taken it upon himself to post the card number as well. A bit of overkill in my opinion, but it also attempts to avoid any confusion.

If you want to see a tutorial on how not to post, take a look at "The New Guy" and his 50 posts that all say, "Yeah, you're right."
-wtk

November 30, 2010, 03:47:26 am
Reply #10

MuadDib85

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Ranger
  • Posts: 940
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2010, 03:47:26 am »
MuadDib has always taken it upon himself to post the card number as well.

Actually, those deck layouts I use are straight from sda. I don't type out each number, just one copy and paste. :)

November 30, 2010, 11:35:29 am
Reply #11

hrcho

  • ****
  • Information Offline
  • Marksman
  • Posts: 588
  • One does not simply Rock into Mordor.
    • My trade list
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2010, 11:35:29 am »
If you want to see a tutorial on how not to post, take a look at "The New Guy" and his 50 posts that all say, "Yeah, you're right."
-wtk

:gp:
Some days you're the statue, and some days you're the pigeon.

Trade List (TLHH)
Trade List (Mahasamatman)

November 30, 2010, 11:49:02 am
Reply #12

The New Guy

  • Guest
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2010, 11:49:02 am »
Oh yeah real funny Ket. And the fact that Thats happened only a few times is even better. lol funny what you wrote

November 30, 2010, 04:14:30 pm
Reply #13

MR. Lurtzy

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Posts: 2745
  • Wouldn't it be nice if we were Hodor?
    • My website
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2010, 04:14:30 pm »
If you want to see a tutorial on how not to post, take a look at "The New Guy" and his 50 posts that all say, "Yeah, you're right."
-wtk

:gp:

:gp: x1000

November 30, 2010, 06:21:32 pm
Reply #14

ket_the_jet

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • King
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 2062
  • He/Him/His
Re: Hobbit Ents - Dunland Skirmish Playing
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2010, 06:21:32 pm »
Oh yeah real funny Ket. And the fact that Thats happened only a few times is even better. lol funny what you wrote

Example 1.
Example 2 (note, 1 year later).
Example 3 (response to a rhetorical question).
Example 4 (too many to link to in this thread).
Example 5 (I just can't figure out the context).
Example 6 (things that piss me off when I click on the "See New Posts" link).

That took about three minutes with the handy-dandy search function. And before some people get on my case for being mean, I wasn't the first to notice....

Edit: Even Incognito noticed!
-wtk
« Last Edit: November 30, 2010, 07:54:03 pm by ket_the_jet »